The world of ERC is ever evolving. I feel like I could share an update on it every week, especially with the increasing number of fraud cases that keep surfacing. And yes, those persistent ERC Mills are still at it, pushing businesses to claim credits they might not even be eligible for.
The latest scoop? Due to the prevalent fraud issues, the IRS has extended the period to seek repayment by an additional 2 years. That's right, from the standard 3 years, they now have a total of 5 years—even if the original statute of limitations has expired.
What is the Employee Retention Credit?
For those unfamiliar, the Employee Retention Credit was established as a response to the economic hardships many faced due to the pandemic. It provided a credit for eligible employers who kept their employees on payroll, despite facing economic challenges.
The Big Change:
While the Employee Retention Credit has been a boon for many, it's crucial to understand that the IRS is now empowered to review, audit, or seek repayment of undeserved funds up to **five years** after an ERC filing.
Why This Matters:
If your business utilized the Employee Retention Credit, it's crucial to ensure that all records, justifications, and calculations are in order. An unexpected IRS audit years down the line can pose significant challenges, both financially and operationally.
What You Can Do:
Stay informed and prepared.
Review your ERC claim, ensuring it aligns with all requirements and guidelines.
Maintain meticulous records of all documentation used for your ERC filing.
If unsure, consider consulting with a CPA or financial advisor to review your ERC claim and ensure its accuracy.
In Conclusion:
While the Employee Retention Credit has provided much-needed relief to businesses during challenging times, it's essential to stay vigilant and aware of the evolving regulations around it. Being proactive now can prevent potential issues down the line.
Remember, as always, we're here to help and guide you through these financial intricacies. Stay informed and stay ahead!
Comments